h1

Cobalt Strike’s Process Injection: The Details

August 21, 2019

Cobalt Strike 3.14 finally delivered some of the process injection flexibility I’ve long wanted to see in the product. In this post, I’d like to write about my thoughts on process injection, and share a few details on how Cobalt Strike’s implementation(s) work. Along the way, I will share details about which methods you might want to use in your red team exercises.

Where does Cobalt Strike process inject?

Cobalt Strike does process injection in a few places. Some of its artifacts spawn and migrate to a new process. While these are an important part of the attack chain, they’re under your control via the Artifact Kit, Applet Kit, and Resource Kit. This post focuses on the process injection in Cobalt Strike’s Beacon payload.

The inject and shinject commands inject code into an arbitrary remote process. Some of the tool’s built-in post-exploitation jobs can target specific remote processes too. Cobalt Strike does this because it’s safer to inject a capability into a context that has the data you want vs. migrating a payload and C2 to that context.

Many of Cobalt Strike’s post-exploitation features spawn a temporary process, inject the feature’s DLL into the process, and retrieve the results over a named pipe. This is a special case of process injection. In these cases, we control the temporary process. We know the process has no purpose beyond our offense action. This allows us to do more aggressive things. For example, we can take over the main thread of these temporary processes and not worry about giving it back. This is an important detail to keep in mind when configuring process injection in Cobalt Strike.

The Process Injection Cycle

The process-inject block in a Malleable C2 profile is where you configure process injection in Cobalt Strike:

process-inject {
	# set remote memory allocation technique
	set allocator "NtMapViewOfSection";

	# shape the content and properties of what we will inject
	set min_alloc "16384";
	set userwx    "false";

	transform-x86 {
		prepend "\x90";
	}

	transform-x64 {
		prepend "\x90";
	}

	# specify how we execute code in the remote process
	execute {
		CreateThread "ntdll!RtlUserThreadStart";
		CreateThread;
		NtQueueApcThread-s;
		CreateRemoteThread;
		RtlCreateUserThread;
	}
}

This block is organized around the lifecycle of the process injection process. Here are the steps:

1. Open a handle to the remote process
2. Allocate memory in the remote process
3. Copy the injected data to the remote process
4. Ask the remote process to execute our injected code

Allocate and Copy Data to a Remote Process

Step 1 is kind of implicit. If we spawn a temporary process (e.g., for a post-exploitation job); we already have a handle to do things to the remote process. If we want to inject code into an existing remote process (naughty, naughty), Cobalt Strike will use OpenProcess to do this.

Steps 2 and 3:

Cobalt Strike offers two options to allocate memory in a remote process and copy data to it.

The first option is the classic VirtualAllocEx -> WriteProcessMemory pattern. This is a common pattern in offense tools. This option also works across different process architectures. This matters. Process injection is not limited to an x64 process context injecting into an x64 target process. A good implementation needs to account for the different corner cases that come up (e.g., x86 -> x64, x64 -> x86, etc.). This requirement makes VirtualAllocEx a safe choice. It’s also the default Cobalt Strike uses. If you want to explicitly specify this pattern: set the process-inject -> allocator option to VirtualAllocEx.

Cobalt Strike also has the CreateFileMapping -> MapViewOfFile -> NtMapViewOfSection pattern. This option creates a file mapping that is backed by the Windows system paging file. It then maps a view of that mapped file into the current process. Cobalt Strike then copies the injected data to the memory associated with that view. The NtMapViewOfSection call makes the same mapped file (with our local changes) available in the remote target process. This is available if you set process-inject -> allocator to NtMapViewOfSection. The downside to this option is it only works x86 -> x86 and x64 -> x64. For cross-architecture injection, Cobalt Strike will fall back to the VirtualAllocEx pattern. This pattern is useful in situations where a defense solution hones in on VirtualAllocEx -> WriteProcessMemory but does not detect other methods to copy data into a remote process.

Transform your Data

The above description of steps 2 and 3 assumes that you’re copying the injected data over as-is. That’s not necessarily true. Cobalt Strike’s process-inject block has options to transform the injected data. The min_alloc option is the minimum size of the block Beacon will allocate in a remote process. The startrwx and userwx options are a hint to the initial and final permissions of the allocated memory. If you want to avoid RWX pages, set these options to false. The transform-x86 and transform-x64 blocks allow you to pad either side of the injected data. If you prepend data, make sure it’s valid code to execute for that architecture.

The options to transform content in the process-inject block are very basic. They’re basic because these are options that are safe for all injected content. If I assume what I receive is a position-independent blob that is a self-contained program, I know I am OK to prepend and append data to it at will. If I assume that this position-independent blob does not modify itself, I know I can get away without RWX permissions. These things are as far as I’m willing to go with data I know nothing about. For more aggressive changes to injected content itself, use the Malleable C2 stage block to modify Beacon. Use the Malleable C2 post-ex block to modify Cobalt Strike’s actual post-exploitation DLLs.

Don’t dismiss these transforms because they are basic though. A lot of content signatures look for specific bytes at fixed offsets from the beginning of an observable boundary. These checks occur in O(1) time which is favorable to an O(n) [or worse] search. Too many expensive checks and a security technology can run into performance issues.

Binary padding can also affect the thread start address offset of your Cobalt Strike post-exploitation jobs. When Beacon injects a DLL into memory; it starts the thread at the location of that DLL’s exported ReflectiveLoader function. This offset shows up in the thread’s start address characteristic and is a potential indicator to hunt for a specific post-exploitation DLL. Data prepended to an injected DLL affects this offset. (Less visible threads help too; we’ll get to that in a moment…)

Part 3 of In-Memory Evasion has some more discussion on content, memory, and thread characteristics that are used to detect injected DLLs in memory.

Code Execution: So many damned corner cases…

At this point, we assume our injected content is in the remote process. The next step is execute that content. This is where the process-inject -> execute block comes in. Here, you get to specify which options Cobalt Strike will consider when it needs to inject code. Beacon goes through these options, one at a time, and tries the options that are valid to the current context. When one of these options succeeds, Beacon stops this process.

I mentioned it earlier, but I want to emphasize it again: process injection is filled with corner cases. The list of options you specify has to cover these corner cases. If your list of options misses a corner case, you will find that process injection fails for seemingly random reasons. My goal with this blog post is to help clear up some of these seemingly random reasons.

What are those corner cases?

All of the injection techniques implemented in Cobalt Strike work x86 -> x86 and x64 -> x64. Injecting from one architecture into the other is a trivial base case. But, x86 -> x64 and x64 -> x86 are contexts that matter too.

One context factor (favorable, if we treat it different) is whether or not the remote process is a throw-away temporary process. Remember, Beacon’s post-ex jobs spawn a temporary process and because the process is temporary—we can do more aggressive things.

Another favorable context factor is self injection. If we inject into our own process, we can and should treat that differently. We can simply use VirtualAlloc and CreateThread when injecting into ourself. When dealing with a security stack that aggressively swat remote process injection, self-injection is a way to safely use capabilities that can target a remote process.

One last corner case is whether or not the injected data has an argument. I can pass an argument via SetThreadContext with an x64 target (thanks fastcall!). Cobalt Strike’s implementation can’t pass an argument, via SetThreadContext, with an x86 target. Bummer.

We’re not done though. When dealing with remote process injection there are other factors. Some methods are riskier on Windows XP era systems. *gasp*. RtlCreateUserThread falls into this camp. And, other methods don’t work when you have to inject across desktop session boundaries (CreateRemoteThread, I’m looking at you).

Code Execution: The perfect execute block

Some of the execute options are scoped to the special cases described above. When you specify your execute block, put these special cases (self-injection, suspended processes) first. Beacon will ignore these options when they’re not right for the current injection context.

Next, you should follow up with which methods you want Beacon to use in-general. Remember, each method has different context limitations and failure cases. If you care that your process injection succeed, OPSEC be damned, make sure you have backups to the primary methods you specify. This is how Beacon’s process injection cocktail worked before 3.14 gave control to your profiles.

Let’s walk through the different execute options implemented in Beacon and their nuances:

Code Execution: CreateThread

I’ll start with CreateThread. I think CreateThread should come first in an execute block (if it’s there at all). This function will only run when you’re doing self-injection. You can use CreateThread which will spin up a thread pointing to the code you want Beacon to run. Be cautious though. When you self-inject this way, your thread will have a start address that’s not associated with one of the modules (DLLs, the current program itself) loaded into the current process space. This is a tell used to detect injected content. To help with this, you can specify CreateThread “module!somefunction+0x##”. This variant will spawn a suspended thread that points to the specified function. If the specified function is not available via GetProcAddress; this variant will immediately fail. Beacon will use SetThreadContext to update this new thread to run your injected code. This is a way of doing self-injection in a way that gives your thread a more favorable start address.

Code Execution: SetThreadContext

The next place to go is SetThreadContext. This is one of the methods available to take over the primary thread of a temporary process spawned for a post-exploitation job. Beacon’s SetThreadContext option works x86 -> x86, x64 -> x64, and x64 -> x86. If you choose to use SetThreadContext, put it after the CreateThread option(s) in your execute block. When you use SetThreadContext; your thread will have a start address that reflects the original execution entry point of the temporary process.

Code Execution: NtQueueApcThread-s

Another option for suspended processes is NtQueueApcThread-s. This option uses NtQueueApcThread to queue a one-off function that runs when the target thread wakes up next. In this case, the target thread is the primary thread of our temporary process. This methods next step is to call ResumeThread. This function wakes up the primary thread of our suspended process. Because the process is suspended, we don’t have to worry about giving this primary thread back to the process. Supposedly, executing code this way, allows our injected capability to initialize itself in the process before some userland-resident security products initialize themselves. This method of evasion was labeled the early bird injection technique by researchers from Cyberbit. This option is x86 -> x86 and x64 -> x64 only.

The use of SetThreadContext vs. NtQueueApcThread-s are up to you. I don’t think one is clearly better than the other in all contexts.

Code Execution: NtQueueApcThread

The next option to consider is NtQueueApcThread. This is a different implementation from NtQueueApcThread-s. It’s designed to target an existing remote process. This implementation pushes an RWX stub to the remote process. This stub contains both code and context related to the injection. To execute this stub, we add our stub to the APC queue of every thread in the remote process. If one of those threads enters an alertable state, our stub will execute.

What does the stub do?

The stub first checks if it was already run. If it was, it does nothing. This is to prevent our injected code from running multiple times.

The stub then calls CreateThread with our injected code and its argument. We do this to allow the APC to quickly return and let the original thread go on about its business.

There’s a risk that no thread will wake up and execute our stub. Beacon waits about 200ms and checks the stub to determine if the code ran. If it didn’t, we update the stub to mark the injection as having run, and we move on to the next injection technique. That’s the implementation of this technique.

I’ve had several requests for this option, because some security products have less visibility into this event. That said, this implementation has its OPSEC concerns. It does push that RWX stub which itself is a noisy memory indicator. It also calls CreateThread against our code that was pushed into this remote process. The start address of this thread is not backed by a module on disk. It won’t do well with a Get-InjectedThread sweep. If you find this injection method valuable, go ahead and use it. Just be aware that it has its trade-offs. One other note: this method (as I’ve implemented it) is x86 -> x86 and x64 -> x64 only.

Code Execution: CreateRemoteThread

Another option is CreateRemoteThread. This is the standard-issue remote process injection technique. As of Windows Vista, it does fail when injecting code across session boundaries. In Cobalt Strike, vanilla CreateRemoteThread covers x86 -> x86, x64 -> x64, and x64 -> x86 cases. This technique is also very visible. The Sysmon event 8 will fire when this method is used to create a thread in another process. Beacon does implement a CreateRemoteThread variant that accepts a fake start address in the form “module!function+0x##”. Like CreateThread, Beacon will create this thread in a suspended state and use SetThreadContext/ResumeThread to make it run our code. This variant is x86 -> x86 and x64 -> x64 only. This variant will fail if the specified function is not available via GetProcAddress.

Code Execution: RtlCreateUserThread

The last option available to Cobalt Strike’s execute block is RtlCreateUserThread. Be aware! This option is similar to CreateRemoteThread without some of its limitations. It does have its own drawbacks though.

RtlCreateUserThread will inject code across session boundaries. Supposedly it has some trouble in some injection contexts on Windows XP. This may or may not matter to you. This method DOES fire Sysmon event 8 as well. One benefit to RtlCreateUserThread is it covers x86 -> x86, x64 -> x64, x64 -> x86, AND x86 -> x64. This last corner case is important to address.

x86 -> x64 injection happens when you’re in an x86 Beacon context and you spawn an x64 process for a post-exploitation job. The hashdump, mimikatz, execute-assembly, and powerpick modules all default to an x64 context where they can. To pull off the feat of x86 -> x64 injection, this implementation transitions your x86 process to an x64 mode and injects an RWX stub to call RtlCreateUserThread from an x64 context. This implemention comes from Meterpreter and the RWX stub is a loud memory indicator. I’ve long advised: “stay x64 as much as possible”. This type of detail is the reason why. I do recommend RtlCreateUserThread exist in any process-inject -> execute block though. It makes sense to have this as the bottom-most option. Use it when nothing else works.

Life without (Remote) Process Injection

When I think about how to make an offense technique flexible, I also like to give similar consideration to what would I do if this technique were not an option?

Process injection is a way to move a payload/capability to a different process context (e.g., go from desktop session 0 to desktop session 1). It’s possible to move to a different process context without remote process injection. Use the runu command. This Beacon command will execute a program as a child of an arbitrary process you specify. This is a way to get a capability into another desktop session (for example) without remote process injection.

Process injection is also a way to execute capabilities on-target without putting a capability on disk. In Cobalt Strike; many post-exploitation capabilities have the option to target a specific process. To use these without remote process injection; specify your current Beacon process. This is self-injection.

Sometimes, putting something on disk is the best option available. I once had success compiling a keystroke logger as a DLL and dropping it to c:\windows\linkinfo.dll to (eventually) load it into explorer.exe. We used an open share on the same system to periodically grab our keystrokes. This helped my colleagues and I operate in a highly-scrutinized situation where it was difficult to keep a memory-resident payload alive on target.

If you enjoy these types of thought exercises; I recommend watching Agentless Post Exploitation and Fighting the Toolset.

h1

That time a printer tried to get Cobalt Strike

June 21, 2019

I’m sometimes asked: “Raphael, what does Strategic Cyber LLC do to control Cobalt Strike?” That’s the subject of this blog post.

What is Cobalt Strike? The textbook answer is that Cobalt Strike is a platform for red team operations and adversary simulations. In the right hands, Cobalt Strike empowers security professionals and enables better security assessments.

While the product’s capability makes it a popular choice for red team security assessments, it’s also dangerous in the wrong hands. That’s not something we take lightly. A great effort goes into limiting distribution of Cobalt Strike to security professionals who will only use the product for ethical penetration testing purposes.

  • We perform a screen and risk assessment of all trial requests and sales—a process that includes assessment of the organization’s plausible use case
  • We degrade functionality in the product’s trial distribution.
  • Our licensed product adds identifiers to its payloads that attribute the end-user.

If you’d like to learn more, I recommend that you read our Corporate Compliance and Ethics document.

I can haz Cobalt Strike?

While our screening and risk assessment reduces risk—it doesn’t eliminate it. Yet, the process is working.

One day, we received a trial request from a Detective in a small town police department. The provided email was biz350@[domain].gov. We initially read this as a generic procurement address. Some organizations have these. With GDPR, I expect we’ll see a lot more of this from EU entities going forward too.

We didn’t have any concerns about the identity or location of this end-user organization. The risk assessment is where we ran into problems. We had to ask the obvious question: Why would a small police department need Cobalt Strike? Is a patrolman using department time and budget to get an OSCP? We denied the trial request.

A few days later, we received a follow-up email from the email address associated with the trial request. The writing was odd though. It came off like a professional correspondence fed through an LOLcat translator.

That wasn’t the kicker though. The email name read “Minolta Copier”. A quick Google search revealed that biz350 is a model of an internet connected printer/copy machine.

At this point, we were convinced the entity was compromised. We gathered up the information we had and opted to notify the organization. That was an awkward call.

“Hello, dispatch.”

“Hi… uh… I’d like to speak to someone in IT?”

“Excuse me, can you state the reason why?”

“I promise, this isn’t a phishing scam, I think your printer is hacked”

“…”

While we can’t share the specific “red flags” we use, every sale and trial request goes through our screening and risk assessment process. This forces us to ask questions and find answers. When something doesn’t add up, we either collaborate to resolve it, or disengage completely.

Reporting incidents and artifacts?

From time to time, we receive informal requests for technical assistance or records from private entities. Our policy is not to perform analysis for, provide deconfliction services to, or disclose our records to private entities upon informal request.

If we have information relevant to a law enforcement investigation, we comply with valid legal process.

This stance is to avoid frivolous requests and to protect our customer’s information.

We also investigate tips. We can’t usually share information back, but we look into things brought to our attention. support@strategiccyber.com is the best email address to start those conversations.

h1

Cobalt Strike 3.14 – Post-Ex Omakase Shimasu

May 2, 2019

Cobalt Strike 3.14 is now available. This release benefits the OPSEC of Beacon’s post-exploitation jobs. To take a screenshot, log keystrokes, dump credentials, or scan for targets: Beacon often spawns a temporary process, injects the capability into it, and receives results over a pipe. While Cobalt Strike has a lot of flexibility around launching temporary processes, it has had too few options for the actions that come next. This release changes that.

Malleable Process Injection, pt. 2

It makes sense to start this discussion with process injection. This is a key part of Beacon’s post-exploitation attack chain. The process injection code-path in Beacon is some of the oldest code in the payload and it was originally designed to “just work” in the myriad of corner cases this offense technique requires. These corner cases are not trivial. x86 -> x86, x86 -> x64, x64 -> x86, and x64 -> x64 in both suspended and not suspended processes are cases that a process-injection implementation needs to account for. The above becomes more complicated as some options fail across desktop session boundaries and others are riskier on older Windows XP-era systems. You can say “I don’t care about Windows XP”, and to some extent I don’t either, but Cobalt Strike’s Beacon circa 2012 had to cope with this.

Cobalt Strike 3.12 made some progress on process injection flexibility. This release picks up where 3.12 left off. Here’s what it looks like:

process-inject {
	# set remote memory allocation technique
	set allocator "NtMapViewOfSection";

	# shape the content and properties of what we will inject
	set min_alloc "16384";
	set userwx    "false";

	transform-x86 {
		prepend "\x90";
	}

	transform-x64 {
		prepend "\x90";
	}

	# specify how we execute code in the remote process
	execute {
		CreateThread "ntdll!RtlUserThreadStart";
		CreateThread;
		NtQueueApcThread-s;
		CreateRemoteThread;
		RtlCreateUserThread;
	}
}

Remote Memory Allocation

The process-inject -> allocator Malleable C2 option presents two paths to allocate memory within and copy data to a remote process.

The default VirtualAllocEx uses the venerable VirtualAllocEx -> WriteProcessMemory combination. The NtMapViewOfSection option has Beacon create a file mapping in the current process, copy the code to this local section, and map it into the remote process with NtMapViewOfSection. This option is limited to same-architecture target process (VirtualAllocEx is always the fallback).

Code Execution

3.14 also offers control over which techniques Beacon uses to execute code in a remote process and in which order it attempts them. This is done with the process-inject -> execute block. When executing code in a remote process: Beacon examines each option in the execute block, determines if the option is fair game for the current context, tries it if it’s relevant, and stops this process if code execution was successful.

Cobalt Strike’s options include:

  • CreateThread
  • CreateThread “module!Function+0x##”
  • CreateRemoteThread
  • CreateRemoteThread “module!Function+0x##”
  • NtQueueApcThread
  • NtQueueApcThread-s
  • RtlCreateUserThread
  • SetThreadContext

The CreateThread option is specific to self-injection.

The SetThreadContext and NtQueueApcThread-s options are specific to the temporary processes Beacon launches for its post-exploitation jobs. These functions take over the main thread of the suspended process and use it to execute the injected post-exploitation capability. The NtQueueApcThread-s option is Cobalt Strike’s implementation of the so-called Early Bird technique.

NtQueueApcThread, RtlCreateUserThread, and CreateRemoteThread are standard-issue options to inject code into a remote process. The RtlCreateUserThread option has an implementation variant for x86 -> x64 injection. CreateRemoteThread and RtlCreateUserThread both handle x64 -> x86 injection. All other options cover x86 -> x86 and x64 -> x64 injection.

CreateThread and CreateRemoteThread have variants that spawn a thread with the address fo another function, update the suspended thread to execute our code, and then resume the thread. This is useful to duck past techniques like Get-InjectedThread. Use [function] “module!function+0x##” to specify the start address to spoof. For remote processes, ntdll and kernel32 are the only recommended modules to pull from. The optional 0x## part is an offset added to the start address.

With the execute block, you may arrange these functions in an order of preference you’d like to use in your operations. It’s OK to omit or include options to tailor Beacon’s behavior to the adversary capability you’d like to emulate.

Revised Post-exploitation DLLs

Cobalt Strike 3.14 adds a post-ex block to Malleable C2. This block collects options to tweak the content and behavior of the post-exploitation jobs in Cobalt Strike.

post-ex {
	# control the temporary process we spawn to
	set spawnto_x86 "%windir%\\syswow64\\WerFault.exe";
	set spawnto_x64 "%windir%\\sysnative\\WerFault.exe";

	# change the permissions and content of our post-ex DLLs
	set obfuscate "true";

	# pass key function pointers from Beacon to its child jobs
	set smartinject "true";

	# disable AMSI in powerpick, execute-assembly, and psinject
	set amsi_disable "true";
}

Existing options such as spawnto_x86, spawnto_x64, and amsi_disable were moved to the post-ex block.

The obfuscate option scrambles the content of the post-ex DLLs and settles the post-ex capability into memory in a more OPSEC-safe way. It’s very similar to the obfuscate and userwx options available for Beacon via the stage block.

The smartinject option directs Beacon to embed key function pointers, like GetProcAddress and LoadLibrary, into its same-architecture post-ex DLLs. This allows post-ex DLLs to bootstrap themselves in a new process without shellcode-like behavior that is detected and mitigated by watching memory reads of the export address table in kernel32 and friends.

Blocking Vendor DLLs

Process injection does not exist in Windows solely to enable offense software. Some security products inject DLLs into user processes too. They do this to get deeper visibility into and veto power over the activities of the process. This is accomplished by hooking functions associated with common offense techniques.

Related: Google found that Chrome users were 15% more likely to experience a crash when injected code is present in the Chrome process space. Google decided to push back and block these DLLs from the Chrome process space. As an offense engineer, I thought it would benefit my processes if I could ALSO block these unwanted third-party DLLs from my processes. It turns out… this is possible.

Use blockdlls start and Cobalt Strike will launch child processes in a way that denies third-party DLLs access to the same process space. This is accomplished by running the process with a binary security policy attribute that restricts DLL loads to Microsoft-signed DLLs only. This is an option present in Windows 10 since late-2017.

Revised Process and File Browser Tabs

The 3.14 process browser now organizes the process information into a tree. Highlight a process in the tree and it will immediately highlight in the right-side detailed view of the processes. Your current process also shows in yellow. This is a lot easier than trying to follow a flat ps output and figure out which process is the parent of which process:

The 3.14 file browser is now (slightly) friendlier to Beacon’s asynchronous communication style. Each file browser now caches the folder/file listings it has seen. A tree on the left-hand side of the file browser shows which known folders are in the cache and which are not. Colored folders are in the cache. Grey folders are not. Click on an uncached folder in the tree and the file browser will ask Beacon to list that folder on its next check-in. In this way, you can revisit folders you’ve already seen, request multiple folders, and queue up multiple actions (e.g., download, execute, delete) in between Beacon checkins.

These changes should make post-exploitation a little more fun.

Check out the release notes to see a full list of what’s new in Cobalt Strike 3.14. Licensed users may use the update program to get the latest. A 21-day Cobalt Strike trial is also available.

h1

Cobalt Strike Team Server Population Study

February 19, 2019

From February 4, 2019 to February 15, 2019 Strategic Cyber LLC connected to several live Cobalt Strike team servers to download Beacon payloads, analyze them, and study the information within these payloads.

We conducted the survey from a system that exists separate of this company’s logs and records. The survey results were available on the same system. We did not use our logs or records to seed this survey.

We granted access to our survey system and results to a few parties we trusted. We did this to seek feedback on the data, process, and ideas for appropriate use. We also invited these parties to submit team servers for analysis as well. Unfortunately, one of those parties posted many domains from this system’s results to Twitter without our approval or knowledge. Some of these domains included red team infrastructure used by customers. While anyone could conduct the same survey, it was our system’s results that were used.

One of the top priorities at Strategic Cyber LLC is to not disclose or impact the red team operations or penetration tests of our customers. We see this aggregate and unapproved disclosure of domains, from our survey system, as undermining that goal.

The rest of this post details the survey process, what it extracted, and how to make your team server less visible to these types of analysis.

Why did we do this survey?

We conducted this survey as part of our continuous efforts to evaluate and improve our product controls.

How was the survey done?

We used techniques well-known in the blue community to identify Cobalt Strike team servers. We then connected to those servers to request a Beacon payload stage and analyzed its configuration and PE characteristics. We did not circumvent any technological measures to perform the survey.

What information does this analysis yield?

A lot of configuration information (necessary for the Beacon payload to function) is embedded in the Beacon payload DLL. Our analysis extracted hosts, URIs, User-Agents, and other behavior related configuration information. Our analysis also sought to identify: trial vs. licensed, authorization ID, version, and whether or not the product was altered in certain ways.

How did you find these team servers?

Here are the common techniques to identify Cobalt Strike team servers on the internet:

1) The Cobalt Strike product ships with a default SSL certificate for HTTPS communication. This self-signed certificate has no place in a live operation, but it’s still used in many Cobalt Strike deployments. One technique to find Cobalt Strike Beacon controllers is to search for the SHA-256 hash of Cobalt Strike’s default certificates:

2) Cobalt Strike’s DNS server (when it’s enabled) will respond to any request it receives with the bogon IP 0.0.0.0. A search for DNS servers that respond to an arbitrary DNS request with this answer will find Cobalt Strike systems. It will also find non-Cobalt Strike systems as well. It’s a noisy indicator.

3) Search for systems with port 50050 open. This is the controller for Cobalt Strike’s team server.

4) Another technique is to look for 404 Not Found root page with empty content and a text/plain Content-Type. This is the default response of Cobalt Strike without a redirector or content explicitly hosted at /.

How was the payload stage requested?

As part of its feature set and workflows, Cobalt Strike hosts the Beacon payload stage on its built-in web server. Cobalt Strike is compatible with the Metasploit Framework’s staging protocol. Any HTTP request that has the proper checksum8 value will yield a Beacon payload. Our system makes a request for a payload in the same way a Metasploit Framework stager would.

Protecting your team server

The process we used for our survey is nothing new or unknown. If you’d like to reduce the visibility of your team server to these mass analysis studies, here are a few tips:

1) Do not use the default HTTPS certificate within Cobalt Strike. If your goal is to emulate a low-tier actor with a self-signed certificate—use the https-certificate Malleable C2 block to generate a self-signed certificate that supports your exercise narrative. If you have a live operation, use a valid SSL certificate with your HTTPS Beacon.

2) The 0.0.0.0 is a well-known indicator of the DNS beaconing feature in Cobalt Strike. Use the dns_idle Malleable C2 option to change this to something else.

3) Edit the last line of the teamserver script to change the port from 50050 to something else. This is a very minimal measure. A better solution is to limit who can connect to this port with a host-based firewall.

4) If Cobalt Strike is hosting a Beacon payload stage, it will send payload stages in response to a valid request. This remains true, even if you configure the http-stager block in Cobalt Strike. The http-stager block reconfigures staging indicators within Cobalt Strike. It does not disable the compatibility with the Metasploit Framework. If you do not want Cobalt Strike to host a payload stage, set the host_stage Malleable C2 option to false. This option will require some changes to how you operate.

5) Use an Apache or Nginx web server as a redirector for your Cobalt Strike team server. Limit 80/443 connections to your team server to these redirectors. A properly configured redirector will smooth out indicators specific to Cobalt Strike’s web server (e.g., the JA3S fingerprint for SSL connections). A redirector is also an opportunity to serve legitimate content in response to non-staging and non-command and control URIs. The Red Team Infrastructure Wiki has advice on this topic.

h1

Cobalt Strike 3.13 – Why do we argue?

January 2, 2019

Cobalt Strike 3.13 is now available. This release adds a TCP Beacon, process argument spoofing, and extends the Obfuscate and Sleep capability to the SMB and TCP Beacons.

TCP Beacon

Cobalt Strike has long had the ability to pivot over named pipes. Cobalt Strike 3.13 expands this peer-to-peer pivoting model with the TCP Beacon. Now, you can use the bind TCP Beacon as a target for privilege escalation and lateral movement. Like the SMB Beacon, you may disconnect from the TCP Beacon and reconnect to it from another Beacon (in the same Cobalt Strike instance) later.

Pivot Listeners in Cobalt Strike 3.13 are now stageless Reverse TCP Beacon listeners. You may bind a pivot listener from a Beacon session and export a stageless TCP Beacon artifact that connects to it.

Cobalt Strike’s SSH sessions have the ability to control TCP Beacon sessions too! Yes, you can now SSH into a pivot host and use it to resume control of a Beacon mesh.

Pivot Listeners for the Reverse TCP Beacon work from SSH sessions too, but with one caveat: the SSH daemon often restricts reverse port forwards to localhost only. You can change this with the GatewayPorts option in your SSH configuration. For those of you who use dropbear as a *NIX RAT (*cough*I know you’re out there*cough*), this is a nice added pivoting option.

Process Argument Spoofing

One of 2018’s must-watch talks for red teamers is Red Teaming in the EDR Age by Will Burgess. This talk discusses a few techniques for EDR evasion, to include: spoofing parent processes, process argument spoofing, and hiding in-memory. After Will’s talk, I opted to take a look at how to add process argument spoofing as a session prepping option in Cobalt Strike. Here’s what I came up with:

Beacon’s argue command allows you to add a command and a set of fake arguments to an internal list. When Beacon launches one of these commands [an exact match is required], it will launch it with fake arguments in a suspended state. Beacon then updates the process memory with the real arguments and resumes its execution. Tools that subscribe to new process creation events will see the old arguments. The child process will execute with the spoofed arguments. This technique is a way to push back on detections that look for malicious process arguments.

As usual, this isn’t the 100% works everywhere silver bullet for red teaming. This technique relies on reading and writing to memory in a remote process. That’s an indicator of badness.

This technique, as I’ve implemented, works x86 -> x86 and x64 -> x64. Also, this technique requires that the fake arguments are as long as or longer than the real arguments. And, finally, programs that determine process arguments by reading the process PEB will see your real arguments and not our fake arguments.

Still, this technique is another way to mask your activity when you absolutely need to run a process on target to get something done.

In-memory Obfuscation, Continued

I’ve long thought it would be cool to have a payload that could obfuscate itself in memory. This is a great way to push back on point-in-time analysis that look for static strings. Cobalt Strike 3.12 introduced this for the HTTP/HTTPS and DNS Beacon payload.

Cobalt Strike 3.13 extends this feature to the SMB and TCP Beacons too. Now, these Beacons will obfuscate themselves while they wait for a new connection. They will also obfuscate themselves while they wait to read information from their parent Beacon. In effect, these Beacons will spend a lot of time obfuscated.

To enable this behavior, set stage -> sleep_mask option to true in your Malleable C2 profile. For the cleanest in-memory experience, I recommend setting stage -> cleanup to true, and working primarily with stageless payloads.

Token Magic

The execute-assembly, net, portscan, and powerpick commands now use your current token. This release also updates the make_token command. It now stores your provided credentials within Beacon. Beacon will fall back to CreateProcessWithLogonW, using these credentials, when it does not have privileges to run the new process with your newly created token. This makes make_token largely usable from an unprivileged context.

Check out the release notes to see a full list of what’s new in Cobalt Strike 3.13. Licensed users may use the update program to get the latest. A 21-day Cobalt Strike trial is also available.

h1

Cobalt Strike 3.12 – Blink and you’ll miss it

September 6, 2018

Cobalt Strike 3.12 is now available. This release adds an “obfuscate and sleep” in-memory evasion feature, gives operators [some] control over process injection, and introduces hooks to shape how Beacon launches PowerShell.

Obfuscate and Sleep

One method to find adversary presence in an environment is to sweep all running processes for common strings that indicate offense activity. For example, a hunt for the ReflectiveLoader string will find memory-resident Reflective DLLs that don’t change the name of this exported function. Point-in-time analysis of memory is a powerful tool in the defender’s arsenal of capabilities.

To push back, Cobalt Strike 3.12 introduces obfuscate-and-sleep. This feature is exactly what it sounds like: Beacon is (mostly) a single-threaded beaconing agent. It requests tasks, executes those tasks, and it goes to sleep. Beacon spends most of its time sleeping. When obfuscate-and-sleep is enabled, Beacon will obfuscate itself, in memory, before it goes to sleep. When the agent wakes up, it will restore itself to its original state.

To enable obfuscate-and-sleep, set the stage -> sleep_mask option to true in your Malleable C2 profile.

stage {
	set sleep_mask "true";
}

This feature plays well with Cobalt Strike’s other in-memory evasion/threat emulation features. I recommend the use of Cobalt Strike 3.11’s cleanup option when sleep_mask is enabled.

Re: the SMB Beacon

The obfuscate-and-sleep feature benefits the HTTP, HTTPS, and DNS Beacon. The SMB Beacon doesn’t sleep in the way these agents do. This means the SMB Beacon will not obfuscate itself (it has no opportunity to do so). A future Cobalt Strike update may find a way to sneak this feature into the SMB Beacon too.

Malleable Process Injection

Process Injection is an important offense technique, used heavily throughout Cobalt Strike. This release gives operators control over how Beacon does process injection. This is done via the Malleable C2 process-inject block:

process-inject {
	# do not allocate anything less than this
	set min_alloc "16384";

	# permissions RWX, RX
	set startrwx "true";
	set userwx   "false";

	# fudge the content.
	transform-x86 {
		prepend "\x90\x90\x90";
	}

	transform-x64 {
		# ...
	}

	# we do not want to use this call.
	disable "CreateRemoteThread";
}

These options shape both the injected content and Beacon’s process injection behavior:

The min_alloc option specifies the minimum amount of memory Beacon will allocate in a remote process. The startrwx and userwx options give control over the initial and final permissions of the memory allocated in a remote process.

The transform-x86 and transform-x64 blocks pad any injected DLLs or shellcode. If you choose to prepend data, make sure it’s valid code for the specific architecture. There’s no check for this.

Finally, the disable verb asks Beacon to avoid certain API calls when doing its standard process injection routine. Right now, you can disable CreateRemoteThread, RtlCreateUserThread, or SetThreadContext.

More Power(Shell) to You!

Cobalt Strike uses PowerShell in a lot of its automation. The powershell command allows operators to execute arbitrary cmdlets. psexec_psh bootstraps a session on a remote target with a PowerShell one-liner. The spawnas command uses PowerShell to run a new session as another user.

While it’s possible to operate without PowerShell, sometimes a few adjustments are all that’s needed to safely use PowerShell in an environment. Cobalt Strike 3.12 introduces options to shape the PowerShell command-line and download cradle used in Beacon’s automation.

These options are in Cobalt Strike 3.12’s Resource Kit. Go to Help -> Arsenal to download it.

Notice: Certificate Change Over

The update infrastructure for Cobalt Strike is due for an HTTPS certificate change-over next week. After this change, the update program built into Cobalt Strike 3.11 and earlier will complain about the certificate change (and not download updates). Cobalt Strike 3.12’s updater is aware of the new certificate.

To continue to get updates, without interruption, download the latest Cobalt Strike Trial package with the updated updater. Your license key allows you to skip the trial request process. This action is recommended for all licensed Cobalt Strike users.

Check out the release notes to see a full list of what’s new in Cobalt Strike 3.12. Licensed users may use the update program to get the latest. A 21-day Cobalt Strike trial is also available.

h1

Broken Promises and Malleable C2 Profiles

June 4, 2018

Red Team infrastructure is a detail-heavy subject. Take the case of domain fronting through a CDN like CloudFront. You have to setup the CloudFront distribution, have a valid SSL configuration, and configure your profile properly. If any of these items is wrong, your C2 will not work.

Many folks take “configure your profile properly” for granted. A profile that passes a c2lint check isn’t guaranteed to work in all circumstances you throw at it. A lot of things can go wrong. For example, the CDN may rewrite your HTTP requests in ways that break your Malleable C2 profile. That’s what this blog post is about…

One of my favored ways to quickly setup an SSL-enabled Cobalt Strike is with Alex Rymdeko-harvey‘s HTTPsC2DoneRight.sh script. This script asks a few questions, requests a LetsEncrypt certificate, and sets up a modified Malleable C2 profile that uses this certificate.

The profile used by Alex’s script is amazon.profile. I’ve noticed that many red teamers opt to use this profile with their first experiments to use CloudFront as a redirector for Cobalt Strike.

An Amazon Web Service and an Amazon-like profile, what could go wrong? A lot of things can go wrong. 🙂 If you’ve tried this setup, you may have found a console message [on the team server] that looks like this:

This message means Cobalt Strike could not recover information from an HTTP transaction. Some aspect of the HTTP transaction differs from the assumptions provided by your Malleable C2 profile.

Assumption is the key word. Malleable C2 gives operators a lot of power to change what Cobalt Strike’s HTTP communication looks like. Malleable C2 is an example of a declarative programming language. You, the operator, specify what Beacon’s communication should look like. Cobalt Strike figures out how to make that happen. Specifically, Cobalt Strike compiles your specification into two different programs. One program transforms data and stores it in a transaction. The other program recovers data from a transaction and reverses the transformations made to the data. These programs are patched into the Beacon payload and its controller. If the assumptions of these derived programs break, your communication breaks.

When the above happens, it’s helpful to know how to read the output above and use it to troubleshoot your communication.

Our error message states that Malleable C2 could not recover data from the http-get -> client -> metadata transaction. Beacon provides metadata to tell Cobalt Strike about the session. This RSA-encrypted blob includes situational awareness information (e.g., username, PID, hostname, etc.) and a unique key for the session. Without metadata, Cobalt Strike knows nothing about the session. It’s important that this part of the transaction works.

To resolve this issue, it’s our job to figure out how the expectations of the Malleable C2 profile differ from the reality of the HTTP request received by Cobalt Strike.

Where should we look? The right place is to look at the parts of the HTTP transaction relevant to our failed transaction.

Here’s what the .http-get.client.metadata block looks like in the (slightly modified) amazon profile I used with CloudFront:

http-get {

    set uri "/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1/167-3294888-0262949/field-keywords=books";

    client {

        header "Accept" "*/*";

        metadata {
            base64;
            prepend "session-token=";
            prepend "skin=noskin;";
            append "csm-hit=s-24KU11BB82RZSYGJ3BDK|1419899012996";
            header "Cookie";
        }
    }

The metadata block base64 encodes the metadata, prepends two strings to it, appends another string, and it stores the entire thing in the HTTP Cookie header. OK.

And, here’s a screenshot of the preview generated by c2lint:

In troubleshooting this specific issue, we should ask: does the HTTP Cookie header received by Cobalt Strike differ from the HTTP Cookie header Malleable C2 expects. If so, how and why?

Let’s look at the preview Cookie and the received Cookie side-by-side:

Here, the issue becomes a little more obvious. The Cookie received by Cobalt Strike has the same information, but the parts of the Cookie are in a different order. This is a change CloudFront made to our HTTP transaction. This breaks our profile.

Malleable C2 does not know the semantics of the Cookie field. To recover data from this transaction, it knows it must recover the value of the Cookie header, remove some appended strings, remove some prepended strings, and base64 decode what’s left. Any unexpected change (e.g., spaces removed, new strings, re-arranged strings, etc.) breaks this process.

What’s the solution? In this case, we could update the structure of our HTTP Cookie to match what CloudFront will transform it to. This would work just fine. We could also store our metadata in something other than the Cookie header. Either approach is OK.

http-get {

    set uri "/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1/167-3294888-0262949/field-keywords=books";

    client {

        header "Accept" "*/*";

        metadata {
            base64;
            prepend "session-token=";
            append "csm-hit=s-24KU11BB82RZSYGJ3BDK|1419899012996";
            append "; skin=noskin";
            header "Cookie";
        }
    }

Note: This metadata block will fail a c2lint check because of the space between ; and skin=noskin. c2lint’s advice is sound, but risk averse. Here, the space is necessary to match what we will receive after passing an HTTP transaction through CloudFront.

This blog post focuses on CloudFront because I’ve answered questions about this circumstance in the past. Profile assumptions can fail for other reasons. For example, if you change a profile mid-engagement, expect to see issues like this one. If your HTTP communication fails, due to broken profile assumptions, these steps can help you diagnose the issue and correct your profile.